J6-SV-01
Constitutional Framework & Electoral Count
Official Electoral College and congressional records documenting certification and the January 6–7 joint session.
Evidence: J6-E-0001 · 0002 · 0003 · 0004
Phase 2 · Evidence & Source Development
SOURCE VAULT
& CLAIM TRACKER
A research layer connecting claims to stable evidence IDs while keeping official records, congressional findings, allegations, adjudicated outcomes and later judicial developments distinct.
Source Vault
Official records organized by subject
Each collection points back to the stable J6-E evidence IDs used in the Evidence Ledger.
J6-SV-02
Intelligence, Security & Preparedness
Federal oversight material concerning pre-event threat information, intelligence handling, preparedness and response.
Evidence: J6-E-0005 · 0006 · 0008
J6-SV-03
Select Committee Archive
House Report 117-663 and the GovInfo collection of transcripts, court documents, hearing videos, exhibits and supporting materials.
Evidence: J6-E-0007
Open Official ArchiveJ6-SV-04
Federal Prosecutions & Case Outcomes
Justice Department materials concerning charges and resolved federal cases. Individual outcomes must be described case by case.
Evidence: J6-E-0009
Open Official RecordJ6-SV-05
Judicial Interpretation & Later Developments
Court decisions and later legal developments that alter, narrow or clarify how earlier records should be understood.
Evidence: J6-E-0010
Open Supreme Court OpinionClaim Tracker
What the record supports — and what it does not
Method: Claims are separated from evidence and classified according to the procedural and evidentiary status of the cited record. Congressional findings, allegations, official records and judicial rulings are not interchangeable.
J6-C-0001
Official Electoral College result
SUPPORTED BY OFFICIAL RECORDThe official 2020 Electoral College result recorded 306 electoral votes for Joseph R. Biden Jr. and 232 for Donald J. Trump.
Evidence: J6-E-0001
Qualification: This describes the official certified result; it does not by itself adjudicate every allegation concerning election administration.
J6-C-0002
Congress considered and rejected the Arizona objection
SUPPORTED BY PRIMARY RECORDCongress considered objections during the January 6–7 proceedings and rejected the Arizona objection.
Evidence: J6-E-0002 · J6-E-0003 · J6-E-0004
Qualification: The votes establish Congress's disposition of the objection; they are not judicial findings on every underlying allegation.
J6-C-0003
Pre-event threat information and later oversight findings
SUPPORTED BY GOVERNMENT FINDINGFederal agencies possessed warning information about potential threats before January 6, while later oversight identified shortcomings in processing or sharing some information.
Evidence: J6-E-0005 · J6-E-0006
Qualification: The record does not establish that every agency had identical information or predicted the precise events that occurred.
J6-C-0004
Select Committee findings and public archive
SUPPORTED BY CONGRESSIONAL RECORDThe House Select Committee issued findings and recommendations and released supporting materials for public review.
Evidence: J6-E-0007
Qualification: Committee conclusions and referrals are congressional investigative findings, not criminal convictions.
J6-C-0005
Senate security and response review
SUPPORTED BY GOVERNMENT FINDINGThe bipartisan Senate review identified breakdowns in intelligence handling, security preparation, coordination and response surrounding January 6.
Evidence: J6-E-0008
Qualification: The Senate report is an oversight finding and does not adjudicate individual criminal guilt.
J6-C-0006
Federal prosecutions require case-specific descriptions
SUPPORTED / REQUIRES CASE-SPECIFIC OUTCOMEFederal January 6 cases included arrests, charges, pleas, trials, convictions, dismissals and sentences; a criminal charge alone is not a finding of guilt.
Evidence: J6-E-0009
Qualification: Individual defendants must be described according to their actual case disposition rather than grouped together as convicted.
J6-C-0007
Fischer narrowed one federal obstruction provision
SUPPORTED BY COURT FINDING / LATER DEVELOPMENTThe Supreme Court's Fischer decision narrowed the interpretation of 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(2), affecting a subset of January 6 prosecutions rather than all January 6 cases.
Evidence: J6-E-0010
Qualification: The decision concerns the statutory scope of § 1512(c)(2) and does not erase unrelated charges, convictions or conduct in other cases.