Who is speaking?
Identify the person, their role on or around January 6, and why their account may be relevant.
Documents establish part of the historical record. People preserve another part: what they saw, heard, believed, feared, decided and experienced. This section preserves those accounts while distinguishing personal memory from independently established fact.
First-person testimony can provide information unavailable anywhere else. It can also be incomplete, mistaken, influenced by later events or contradicted by other evidence. The project therefore preserves testimony without automatically adopting every recollection as an established historical fact.
Official January 6 records include public testimony, transcribed interviews, depositions, hearing videos and supporting documents. Those materials provide an important foundation for this section, but the source and procedural setting of each statement must remain visible to readers.
Identify the person, their role on or around January 6, and why their account may be relevant.
Identify the location and whether the person directly observed the event being described.
Distinguish a contemporaneous statement from an interview, deposition or recollection given months or years later.
Identify testimony given under oath, formal transcribed interviews, public interviews and informal recollections separately.
Connect video, audio, documents, communications, other witnesses or records that corroborate material portions of the account.
Present meaningful contrary evidence, conflicting recollections or unresolved discrepancies rather than hiding them.
CONTEMPORANEOUSLATER RECOLLECTIONSWORN TESTIMONYTRANSCRIBED INTERVIEWPUBLIC INTERVIEWDIRECT OBSERVATIONSECONDHAND ACCOUNTCORROBORATEDPARTIALLY CORROBORATEDDISPUTEDCONFLICTING ACCOUNTSUNRESOLVED
These labels describe the evidentiary setting of an account. They are not labels for a person's political affiliation, character or worth.
Voice ID: J6-V-0001
Person: Name and relevant role
Location on January 6: Known location or operational assignment
Source: Hearing / deposition / interview / contemporaneous statement / other
Date of account: Date the testimony or recollection was recorded
Under oath: Yes / No / Not applicable
Direct or secondhand: What the speaker personally observed versus what was reported to them
Related evidence: Video, audio, documents, communications and other testimony
Corroboration: Evidence materially supporting the account
Conflicting evidence: Material discrepancies or contrary accounts
Related legal status: If applicable, clearly separated from the historical account
Reader note: What the account can and cannot establish by itself
| Statement type | How the project treats it |
|---|---|
| “I saw…” | Direct observation, evaluated against location, timing and available records. |
| “I heard…” | May be direct auditory evidence or a secondhand report; the distinction is recorded. |
| “I believed…” | Evidence of the speaker's state of mind, not automatically proof that the underlying belief was true. |
| “Someone told me…” | Secondhand account requiring identification and corroboration where possible. |
| “I remember…” | Later recollection preserved with the time elapsed and any corroborating or conflicting evidence. |
| “The record shows…” | A factual assertion that should be linked directly to the underlying record. |
Two sincere witnesses can remember the same event differently. A witness can also change, clarify or correct an earlier account. When accounts materially conflict, the project should not silently choose one version.
Present the relevant statement with its source, date and evidentiary setting.
Present the conflicting statement under the same standards.
Compare both accounts with video, documents, timestamps, communications, other testimony and adjudicated findings where available.
A future submission system could allow witnesses, participants, officials, responders, journalists and members of the public to offer materials or accounts for preservation. Submission alone should never make an account authenticated evidence.
Receive the account and any supporting files with consent and contact information handled under a published privacy policy.
Evaluate identity, provenance, dates, metadata and supporting records before assigning an authenticated evidence status.
Publish only with appropriate permissions, contextual notes, source classification and protections for sensitive personal information.
Anonymous material: anonymous submissions may provide research leads, but should not automatically enter the authenticated Evidence Ledger as established evidence.
The Government Publishing Office preserves the January 6 Committee final report and supporting materials, including hearing videos, transcribed interviews, depositions and other documents. Those collections provide a durable starting point for evaluating many first-person accounts while keeping the original procedural context visible.
The independent January 6 Memory Project preserves a public archive of Justice Department January 6 materials and linked court filings. It is a separate project and is not operated by Supreme Citizens.
EXPLORE THE JANUARY 6 MEMORY PROJECT →